Though I don't live there all the time, Oxford is
a great place to be. Last night I had a choice of lectures: one by Steven
Pinker (prolific author), one by a lady who has rowed herself around the world,
and one by A C Grayling the philosopher, They were all free and, fortunately, I
chose the latter.
One thing about Grayling - he looks like his name.
He has a splendid mane of graying hair. He is also a kindly looking bloke (a
word that he uses a lot, good man) and a wonderful presenter. The lecture was
in a church, a fact that he, an ardent atheist, made great fun of as he introduced
himself.
This man is more than a philosopher. He has started
his own university: a private one charging fees of £18K per annum and offering
one-to-one tutorials (like Oxford) together with generous grants for those
unable to pay the fees.
His talk was about myths and he cleared up
something that has interested me for many years: why do nearly all societies
have religion? He made it sound quite simple. The idea revolves around agency. From
the moment of self-awareness, humans have been well aware of cause and effect.
When a stone hits the water we want to know who threw it. Perhaps we threw it ourself
- then we are the agent. We caused the effect. When lightning strikes, or a
rainstorm begins, or a volcano erupts then primitive man believed that some
agency must have caused it. It could not have been another person, the effect
is too massive - therefore it must have been a mysterious agent - a god. The
next stage is to personify the gods, and perhaps to appease them by worship.
Where did the gods live? Usually on high inaccessible
mountains. However, as time went by that was disproven, the heights were
scaled, there were no gods. And so the gods had to be moved up, up into the sky,
yet still doing their stuff. Now that we have explored the sky and there is no
god there, god has become ineffable ('too great or extreme to be expressed or
described in words' - a convenient cop out).
That's a brief summary, there was more. Then, in
question time, a local Muslim Mullah came forward in his black robes and white
hat. He proceeded to preach and was booed, "Where's the question?"
shouted members of the audience. He aquitted himself well, asking: "Where
does all this come from? Why are we here? Where are we going afterwards?"
Good questions, replied the philosopher politely, and
then went on to explain. Religion can answer those questions in about half an
hour. Remarkable! Using logic, analysis and reasoning, the scientific method
takes a little longer. It requires years to truly understand cosmology, or particle
physics, or genetics. Yet religion can answer those really big questions
in just thirty minutes! There is
something wrong here. Scientifically, we are still investigating those three
basic questions, and the work will go on and on. Yet people of religion already
have the answers. Or do they?
I found Grayling very convincing in almost everything
that he talked about, but particularly his statement that there is a middle way
between religion and utter disbelief. It is humanism. Today I am going to join
the Oxford Humanists and I am also going to leave the Oxford Civic Society. The
two are not directly connected. I am simply cheesed off with the latter for its
pathetic response to those awful flats that the University has built on our
beautiful Port Meadow and I therefore think that my money would be better spent
on something more fundamentally enriching.
(The talk was organised by the Richard Dawkins Foundation)