There is no doubt that Oxford is a strange place: rare,
desirable, bubbly, historic, intellectual, expensive, etc. Regarding the
latter, on most of my tours I provide a short introduction stating that “I’m
Rob Walters and I live in north-central Oxford where the rich and famous of
this city live.” Then I pause for effect, before confessing that I am not rich
or famous and live in a small flat. Dependent on reaction I then turn to my
latest shocking housing report. When I first started guiding at least a decade
ago I could shock my groups by telling them that a house in my area had
recently sold for more than two million pounds. That was more than a decade ago
and there has been some inflation since then. My latest example is a nine
bedroom detached house in Crick Road which has recently sold for £10,400,000!
To re-establish my own credibility as a guide I go on to
explain that you could buy my whole block of flats for that money and still
have plenty of change. I also sometimes add that I do not know who lives in
these obscenely priced mansions, but that is becoming less true. Recently, in
one of my local pubs, I fell into conversation with a garrulous builder who told
me that he was living in a big place in (highly desirable) Park Town. But his
residence was temporary: the house had been rented for a year or so to provide accommodation
for a team of workers who were renovating and extending the house next door.
That house, he told me, had been bought by...can you guess...a football player!
Furthermore, I have been told of someone nearby who downsized by selling their expensive
home to a character who made a fortune from running an on-line gambling
concern! And this is the area once occupied by the, so called, ‘Dons’ of Oxford
in the late 19th century.
Another view of the city is provided by a meeting of
Skeptics in the Pub. It was a Tuesday night and the theme of that evening’s
talk was science: particularly controversial science such as climate change and
genetically modified crops. Now many pubs are lucky to get any visitors at all that
early in the week, yet the St Aldate’s Tavern upstairs room was rammed full of
people. Even standing space was in very short supply. And all for a talk on
science, though it turned out to be a little more.
The speaker was Mark Lynham, a reformed GM crop destroyer
and self labelled ‘environmentalist’. Mark told us that he had studied physics
as an undergraduate. Presumably unable to procure a decent job in that world he
travelled and on the shores of Lake Titicaca had a supreme awakening that
launched his career as an ‘environmentalist’. In this guise he first became a
leading opponent of genetic modification of crop plants, then a global warming
evangelist. Another awakening followed when Mark realised that all of the facts
underscoring his belief in the evils of GM crops were not scientific facts at
all! He checked the science and became a proponent of GM, apologising for his
earlier, ill-informed actions and determined to make amends. And through this
he became a true defender of truth in science: even to the extent of
attacking the holy green grails of organic food production and the misguided preference
for ‘renewable’ energy production over nuclear. The latter is very dear to my
heart as we, in Spain, look with weary resignation over the encroaching forest
of windgens uglifying the beauty of our nearby mountains.
As I write this blog, no self-respecting speaker in Oxford
is able to conduct a session without having a dig at Trump. And of course Mark
did dig. But, in addition to the usual rants against the new President of
America he tried to solve the outstanding mystery: just how and why did this
millionaire, hotel owning, reality TV host get selected as the ‘most powerful
man on earth’. And here he fell back on his original theme to develop an answer.
Basically, many people do not believe the ‘experts’ anymore, they do not think
that they are capable of speaking the truth. And of course we can all think of
examples that substantiate that belief – the opposition to GM crops being one.
And then along comes someone who people feel they know (from TV), an apparently
self-made man, a man of great confidence who is seemingly a visionary providing
simple solutions to complex problems, hope to the hopeless and jobs to redundant
I think that Mark has matured with age, though some label
him a turncoat who is creating a new career through his support for GM. I do
not agree with all of his environmental beliefs, yet it is refreshing to hear
realistic answers even when they do not fit the bill of ‘saving the planet’. He
has no doubts over the reality of global warming and its causes, yet when asked
if the Paris agreement, now under threat from denier Trump’s zeal, would really
make a difference to climate change, he said no! What was making change, he
argued, were the moves already in place to replace coal with cleaner sources,
in which he even included fracking. He said, I think with pride, that there
were now coal-less days in the UK: days when no coal was burned to produce
electricity. That’s nice, except, of course, for the miners.
On the following evening I attended a talk on space
exploration in which it was proposed that Donald Trump pilots the first manned
flight to Mars. Not really, actually, surprisingly, he wasn’t mentioned.