I have lots of time to think whilst here in rural Spain.
Most of my hours, on most days of the week, are spent all alone working slowly
to create a living space within the huerto (garden/orchard/olive grove thingy).
I like it there and am making some progress: on this visit I have installed the
beams, created a traditional ceiling of arched plaster between them and on
Friday poured concrete on top to create a terrace. What do I think about whilst
doing all this very practical stuff? The work mostly. It is absorbing and
engages most of my conscious thought. Sometimes I sing, so it’s fitting that I’m
alone.
In my other life, my home life if you like, I drink plenty
of beer and some wine. I eat delicious food, watch some Spanish TV and the
occasional English video, greet the villagers at the bar and bid them adios,
write notes about what I have done and read. Yes, of course, I read.
Since I have been here, I have read and enjoyed a large
biography on Dorothy Hodgkin. I did this with a vague intention of writing
about her and Margaret Thatcher. Dorothy was Margaret’s tutor at Oxford and
became famous in scientific circles for her work on the structure of molecules
(she tied down the nature of penicillin and insulin, for example). She was also
an ardent leftist and supporter of the Soviet Union, Communist China and North
Vietnam. Margaret Thatcher…well everyone knows about her, though not everyone
is aware that she started out as a research chemist. Interestingly, I could
only get Dorothy’s biog as a paper book and found it both odd and frustrating
to read. I am now a committed eBooker (a reader of eBooks) and miss the
facilities that my Kindle provides when forced to read a “real” book.
My core reading over here is a tome (does that term apply to
eBooks?) by Francis Fukuyama. It’s all about the origins of political order
which may sound dull, but I find it fascinating. I was equally impressed and
enlightened by his previous book entitled The
End of History and the Last man. For me he has the ability to clarify
things that I half understand about history and particularly the evolution of
society, of us that is. To my delight, he does not start his analysis with
England and the seventeenth century, though now having read 60% of the book
that has become his focus. No, he starts with China of 2,000 plus years ago
when Confucius placed the emphasis on learning and when the most able ran the
state, i.e. those who had passed the relevant exams rather than the sons of the
previous ministers. I learned a little of this when we taught in China and was
impressed by the longevity of the Chinese empire and its ability to absorb
rather than be usurped by invaders. Of course, what Chinese government lacked
was any accountability and it did produce many cruel regimes (the cruelest of
which was lead by a woman – Empress Wu), but it was incredibly successful at
building vast transport and irrigation systems and stable systems of government
capable of holding together an immense empire over millennia.
The thing about a book like Fukuyama’s is that it makes me
think. However, this does not apply to my working hours at the huerto. There, if
you opened my mind, you might find the words of that old rugby song Mary of the Mountain Glen, or a debate
on whether to use a screw or a nail, or the need to know what a passing farmer is transporting
in his tractor trailer, or a curse as a large stone slips from my grasp, or
just nothing, nothing at all.