The perfect tour
I’ve been guiding in Oxford for nearly 20 years now, not continuously
of course – it has always been a part-time activity. In that sense it has
fitted well with my lack of commitment: I could spend long periods in Spain, or
working on our regreening project at Stow on the Wold, or travelling the world.
It also fitted well with my other activities, including writing, walking and
such. It was never a big earner, you need to be very committed to make it your
only source of income, and events can easily result in no income at all: both
winter and lock-down are examples. I haven’t finished guiding yet, but I reckon
the end is somewhere in sight which made me think of the perfect tour. It might
not be what you expect.
The ingredients are pretty much as follows: the participants, the theme, the weather and the guide. By the latter I mean, in this case, the guide’s mental attitude. None of these are truly in a guide’s control. Mostly you have no idea who the participants are going to be beyond nationality or sometimes age. Take a recent day when I had an emergency tour to deliver. The organiser, based in London. wanted the tour delivered on the following day for thirty -three people. I only take nineteen and even that is quite a crowd on the streets of Oxford. Negotiations via phone and email were not complete until the group were on the train and on their way to Oxford! The organiser agreed to split the tour and we agreed on a price for each tour. I quickly showered and rapidly pedalled down to the railway station. I like a challenge.
They were from Wako University in Texas and when we finally
found each other I was greeted with enthusiastic, but undeserved, Texan
whooping. The split was agreed outside the Said Business School and the afternoon
lot wandered off towards the centre. My first lot, mostly young and female, had
a thirst for knowledge about the workings of the Uni and, as often, tried desperately
to fit this to the US system. They do not, of course, fit. But, the long trek
from the station aside, it was a good, though challenging, tour which evinced
many demanding questions from my enthusiastic audience. The tour for the remainder
of the group was at 1.30 pm, meeting at the Weston Library. No one came. I
waited for a while then a couple with two very small children turned up – that was
all. What happened to the other nine I shall never know. And here’s a problem:
a seven and a three-year old have little interest in the workings of the
University and their parents’ main interest is the welfare and happiness of
their kids. Even conjuring up Harry Potter does not help in these
circumstances. Nevertheless, I did my best and dropped them off to meet the
rest of their group at Christchurch where they could take their prearranged audio
tour with their colleagues at the “Harry Potter” college.
Of course, there is no perfect tour. But a state of perturbation
in the guide and enthusiasm in the guided nudges things that way. I suppose one
of my best was with an audience of one: a Harvard professor. At the end of the tour,
actually more of a spirited conversation than tour, he thrust a $50 tip into my
hand. This I heartily refused saying that I had enjoyed the tour just as much
as he claimed to have done, but he insisted.